Legal and Institutional Framework for Emergency Management in the City of Belgrade

Abstract

Emergency management in large cities represents a complex security and organizational process. The subject of this paper is the analysis of the legal and institutional framework for emergency management at the City of Belgrade level. The paper aims to determine the degree of complementarity between relevant regulations and institutional actors, i.e., to what extent legal norms are aligned with the actual capacities for their implementation. The legal analysis encompasses Republic laws (primarily the Law on Disaster Risk Reduction and Emergency Management), by-laws, the Statute of the City of Belgrade, city decisions and planning acts, as well as regulations of city municipalities. The main findings indicate that the legal framework is formally established at all three levels (republic, city, and municipal) and that institutional bodies have been established. However, the substantive complementarity of the legal and institutional framework – i.e., the ability of institutions to actually fulfill the tasks prescribed by law – is significantly impaired. The following deficiencies have been identified: noncompliance with statutory deadlines for adopting planning acts, pronounced inequality in municipal capacities (equipment, training, financial resources), and hampered vertical and horizontal coordination. The reasons for this are financial, cultural, and regulatory control in nature. It is concluded that the complementarity of the legal and institutional framework in Belgrade is largely formal, whereas the system's actual preparedness varies significantly. It is recommended to establish minimum equipment standards with financial support (equalization fund), to introduce mandatory annual exercises and joint training, and to establish clear criteria for activating higher levels of assistance.