Artificial intelligence in integrated disaster risk management: sustainability and human security in Serbia

Authors

  • Ivica Lj. Đorđević Faculty of Security Studies, University of Belgrade, Gospodara Vučića 50, Belgrade, Serbia Author
  • Ozren Džigurski Faculty of Security Studies, University of Belgrade, Gospodara Vučića 50, Belgrade, Serbia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20412862

Keywords:

sustainability, human security, artificial intelligence, governance architecture, institutional coordination

Abstract

The Republic of Serbia has officially decided to integrate sustainability principles into its development framework. It is implementing it in accordance with the principles of sustainable development of the European Union and the United Nations. The goal is to establish a balance between economic growth, environmental protection, social inclusion, and institutional resilience. The National Strategy for Sustainable Development of the Republic of Serbia (NSSD) is a strategic public policy document adopted by the Government in 2008. This strategy represents the first comprehensive framework for integrating economic development, environmental protection, and social cohesion into a single, long-term development vision. Although the NSSD formally expired in 2017, its principles continue to influence public policy-making. The paper analyzes the implementation of sustainability principles in Serbia from the perspective of human security, emphasizing the protection of citizens and communities from economic, environmental, health, food, and institutional risks. The analysis identifies significant implementation shortcomings: formal sustainability policies fail to reduce vulnerability, exposure, and inequality sufficiently. Weak coordination among environmental, health, social, and infrastructure policies limits the impact of sustainability principles on ​​human security, especially for vulnerable social groups and endangered regions. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers significant potential to overcome these shortcomings by enabling proactive, data-driven, cross-sectoral governance. The application of AI can improve environmental monitoring, health risk forecasting, energy and infrastructure system resilience, social vulnerability mapping, and policy impact assessment. However, AI achieves its full potential only when used as a decision-support tool, integrated into institutional processes, and supported by interoperable data systems, ethical safeguards, and ongoing human oversight. Based on the above insights, this paper proposes an AI-based governance architecture to improve sustainability in Serbia. This conceptual governance model is designed as an integrative and adaptive framework that, grounded in the principles of human security, should contribute to reducing the risk of natural and other disasters through evidence-based decision-making and institutional coordination.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Đorđević, I. (2007). Bezbednosna arhitektura u uslovima globalizacije. Beograd: Fakultet bezbednosti.

2. Đorđević Lj. I. (2024). Ljudska bezbednost – Geopoliticki kontekst i primena u Srbiji. Drugo, izmenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje. Beograd: Inovacioni centar Fakulteta bezbednosti, Univerziteta u Beogradu i Akademska misao.

3. Environmental Performance Index (2026, May 1). Serbia. https://epi.yale.edu/country/2024/SRB

4. European Environment Agency (2025, Sept 29). Country profile: Europe's environment 2025 Serbia. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/europe-environment-2025/countries/serbia

5. Government of the Republic of Serbia (2026, May 1). https://www.srbija.gov.rs/

6. HSU (2016). Human security handbook: An integrated approach for the realization of the Sustainable Development Goals and the priority areas of the international community and the United Nations system. New York: Human Security Unit – United Nations.

7. Jevremović V. (2007). Izbor tehnološke strategije za recikliranje proizvoda od gume. Doktorska disertacija, Fakultet tehničkih nauka, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu.

8. Sterman J.D. (2000): Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, Boston: Irwin McGraw Hill.

9. Mohammad, F. R. (2025). A Dynamic Systems Approach to Integrated Sustainability: Synthesizing Theory and Modeling Through the Synergistic Resilience Framework, Sustainability, 17(11), 4878; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114878

10. Mohsen Jahan, (2003). The fourth pillar of sustainability, International Journal of Sustainable Society Sustainable Society, 15(4), 407–443.

11. OECD (2026, May 1). The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/en.html

12. Saaty, T.L. (1980). Analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York.

13. Serbian Artificial Intelligence National Platform (2025, January 2025). Serbia Adopts Strategy for the Development of Artificial Intelligence for the Period 2025–2030. https://ai.gov.rs/vest/en/1296/serbia-adopts-strategy-for-the-development-of-artificial-intelligence-for-the-period-20252030

14. Sustainable Development Goals in the Republic of Serbia (2026, November 12). A Decade of Sustainable Development Goals in the Republic of Serbia, 2015-2025. https://sdg.indikatori.rs/en-us/newsworkshops/news/11122025

15. United Nations in Serbia (2026, May 1). Serbia Reaffirms its Commitment to Agenda 2030 at the SDG Summit in New York. https://serbia.un.org/en/247531-serbia-reaffirms-its-commitment-agenda-2030-sdg-summit-new-york

16. United Nations Development Programme (2026, May 1). https://www.undp.org/

17. UNDP (1994). Human Development Report. New York – Oxford: Oxford University Press.

18. Vensim (2026, April 14). https://vensim.com/software/#Vensim.

19. World Economics (2026, May 1). Serbia's Social Factors. https://www.worldeconomics.com/ESG/Social/Serbia.aspx.

Published

22-02-2026

How to Cite

Đorđević, I. L., & Džigurski, O. (2026). Artificial intelligence in integrated disaster risk management: sustainability and human security in Serbia. Scientific and Professional Conference ‘‘Predrag Marić‘‘, Faculty of Security Studies, University of Belgrade, 1(1), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20412862

Similar Articles

11-16 of 16

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.