Operationalizing the resilience of local communities to flood risk: a capital approach and assessment model
DOI:
https://doi.org/0.5281/zenodo.19339128Keywords:
integrated risk management, economic disasters, systemic risk, resilience, vulnerability, trade fragmentation, economic risk managementAbstract
Floods are among the most widespread and devastating natural hazards in Serbia, causing significant human, material, and environmental losses and slowing long-term local and national development. The consequences of floods do not arise only from the characteristics of the natural event. However, they are largely conditioned by the human factor, i.e., the way space is used, the degree of urbanization, planning, infrastructure quality, and institutional readiness to manage risk before, during, and after the event. Based on modern approaches to disaster risk management, the paper focuses on resilience, reflected in the local community's ability to preserve key functions, reduce losses, adapt to changing conditions, and ensure rapid and sustainable recovery. However, experiences following the major floods of 2014, as well as numerous studies, have shown systemic weaknesses and highlighted that existing solutions are often insufficiently coordinated. In addition, local capacities are uneven, and preventive measures remain insufficiently developed to meet the needs of risk-exposed areas. For this reason, strengthening local governments and building resilient communities are considered strategic priorities. This is because risks are identified more quickly, resources are coordinated effectively, and safety measures that impact citizens are implemented more directly at the local level. Based on this, the paper specifically emphasizes that local governments have a dual role: as the bearer of planning and regulation (spatial planning, urban measures, risk assessment) and as the coordinator of operational activities (preparation, alerting, evacuation, care, and recovery). The paper aims to offer a practically usable framework for strengthening local communities' resilience to floods by conceptualizing and analyzing relevant normative and institutional frameworks. Special attention is paid to the integration of investment (infrastructural) and non-investment measures (organizational, educational, planning, and communication), as well as to their coordination across different levels of governance, with clear division of responsibilities and cooperation mechanisms. The focus is also on harmonizing local policies with modern legislative and strategic solutions of the Republic of Serbia, including the Law on Disaster Risk Reduction and Emergency Management (2018), which encourages more systematic risk management and strengthening prevention. The paper shows that flood risk management cannot be based solely on the traditional “flood defense” model. Still, it requires a shift towards an adaptation approach and the concept of “living with floods”, which implies continuous reductions in vulnerability and improvements in capacity. In this context, in addition to classic protection measures, the systematic strengthening of community resources and capacities — natural, economic, infrastructural, human, social, and institutional — is crucial, because it is precisely their quality that determines how ready a community will be to prevent damage, respond to an event, and recover without long-term disruption. Additionally, the paper highlights the importance of partnerships among local governments, public enterprises, the civil sector, and business to pool resources and implement measures more quickly and efficiently.
Downloads
References
1. Ahmed, S. (2025). Impacts of Flooding Disaster Risk Management Policy For Resilience Building in Pastoral and Agro-pastoral Communities: The Case of Dassenech, Southern Ethiopia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 137–162. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.1.8
2. Ahmed, S. (2025). The Impacts of Upstream Damming of the Omo River on Flood-Retreat Agriculture and Food Security Among Dassanech Agro-pastoralists, Lower Omo Valley, Ethiopia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 529–550. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.2.30
3. Aktiviranje kapitala zajednice u svrhu vitalnog lokalnog razvoja [Activating community capital for vital local development]. (2017). UNDP.
4. Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015). Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 254–269.
5. Al-Maruf, A. (2017). Enhancing disaster resilience through human capital: Prospects for adaptation to cyclones in coastal Bangladesh (Doctoral dissertation). Köln, Germany: Universität zu Köln.
6. Anđelković, B., & Kovač, M. (2016). Socijalni kapital: Nevidljivo lice otpornosti [Social capital: The invisible face of resilience]. Beograd, Serbia: UNDP Srbija.
7. Barik, P., Bhuyan, A., & Hodam, S. (2025). University Students’ Perception, Knowledge, and Preparedness of Flood Disaster Risk Management in Assam (India). International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 417–430. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.1.24
8. Bekić, D., & McKeogh, E. (2013). Primjena karata opasnosti i rizika od poplave u prostorno-planskoj dokumentaciji [Application of flood hazard and risk maps in spatial planning documentation]. In Zbornik radova = Proceedings (pp. 397–412). Zagreb, Croatia: Građevinski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.
9. Bjelić, M., & Lazarević, M. (2016). Finansijski aspekt elementarnih nepogoda: Studija slučaja poplave u Srbiji 2014 [Financial aspects of natural disasters: The case study of the 2014 flood in Serbia]. Beograd, Serbia: Kancelarija Programa Ujedinjenih nacija za razvoj (UNDP) u Srbiji.
10. Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., & Webb, J. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 598–606.
11. Ćuzović, Đ. (2019). Rizik i ekonomske štete od poplava: Osvrt na međunarodna iskustva i prilike u Srbiji [Flood risk and economic losses: A review of international experiences and the situation in Serbia]. Revija, 2, 22–30.
12. Cvetković, V. (2017). Percepcija rizika od prirodnih katastrofa izazvanih poplavama [Risk perception of natural disasters caused by floods]. Vojno delo, 69(5), 160–175.
13. Cvetković, V. (2017). Spremnost građana za reagovanje u prirodnim katastrofama izazvanim poplavama u Republici Srbiji [Citizen preparedness for responding to natural disasters caused by floods in the Republic of Serbia]. Vojno delo, 69(1), 153–190.
14. Cvetković, V. (2026). Upravljanje rizicima od katastrofa: teorija, koncepti i metode [Disaster Risk Management: Theory, Concepts and Methods]. Scientific-Professional Society for Disaster Risk Management, Belgrade.
15. Cvetković, V. M. (2026, March 4). ProSafeNet – The Global Hub for Safety, Security, Risk, and Emergency Professionals and Scientists [«ProSafeNet — глобальный хаб для специалистов и ученых в области безопасности, защищенности, рисков и чрезвычайных ситуаций»] [Conference paper]. XXXVI International Scientific and Practical Conference “Prevention. Rescue. Help” (XXXVI Международная научно-практическая конференция «Предотвращение. Спасение. Помощь»), Novogorsk, Khimki, Moscow Region, Russia.
16. Cvetković, V. M., Milenković, D., & Lukić, T. (2026). Measuring Community Disaster Resilience in Serbia Using an Adapted BRIC Framework Grounded in DROP: Index Construction and Regional Disparities. Geosciences, 16(4), 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16040135
17. Cvetković, V. M., Milenković, D., Lukić, T., & Renner, R. (2026). Theoretical evolution of measuring community resilience to natural and technological disasters: Past, present, and future – Empirical insights from qualitative research in Serbia. Open Geosciences.
18. Cvetković, V., & Radonjić, S. (2022). Ugrožavanje bezbednosti lokalnih zajednica u vanrednim situacijama izazvanim poplavama [Endangering the Security of Local Communities in Emergencies Caused by Floods]. Politika nacionalne sigurnosti, 13(22), 81–105.
19. Cvetković, V., Bošković, N., & Ocal, A. (2021). Individual citizens' resilience to flood-related disasters: A case study of Belgrade. 5th International Symposium on Natural Hazards and Disaster Management, Bursa Technical University, Bursa, Turkey, 24–25 October.
20. Cvetković, V., Ivković, T. (2022). Social Resilience to Flood Disasters: Demographic, Socio-economic and Psychological Factors of Impact”. 12th International Conference of the International Society for the Integrated Disaster Risk Management, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 21-23 September 2022. Hosted by Babeș-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca (Romania), Research Institute for Sustainability and Disaster Management based on High-Performance Computing, and Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering.
21. Cvetković, V., Lipovac, M., & Milojković, B. (2016). Knowledge of secondary school students in Belgrade as an element of flood preparedness. Journal for Social Sciences, TEME, 15(4), 1259–1273.
22. Cvetković, V., Roder, G., Öcal, A., Tarolli, P., & Dragićević, S. (2018). The role of gender in preparedness and response behaviors towards flood risk in Serbia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(12), 2761.
23. Cvetković, V., Roder, G., Tarolli, P., Öcal, A., Ronan, K., & Dragićević, S. (2017). Gender disparities in flood risk perception and preparedness: A Serbian case study. European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2017, Vienna, Austria. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 19, EGU2017-6720.
24. Cvetković, V., Tarolli, P., Roder, G., Ivanov, A., Ronan, K., Öcal, A., & Kutub, R. (2017). Citizens education about floods: A Serbian case study. 7th International Scientific Conference “Archibald Reiss Days”, Academy of Criminalistics and Police Studies, Belgrade.
25. Dada, K. S. J., Mohammed, H. A., & Quadir, R. O. (2025). Disaster risk management in academic institutions: An assessment of preparedness and recovery at Kashim Ibrahim Library, Nigeria. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.1.1
26. Đorđević, M. (2017). Poplave u Srbiji [Floods in Serbia]. Vojno delo, 69(5), 152–159.
27. Elkheir, A. Z., Abdelhamid, M., Mohammed, L., Ali, A., Mohammed, S., Said, E., & Mohammed, M. (2025). Advanced Flood Risk Mapping in Bouarfa Watershed Using Integrated Machine Learning, GIS, and MCDM. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.2.1
28. ftikhar, A., & Iqbal, J. (2023). The Factors responsible for urban flooding in Karachi (A case study of DHA). International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 81–103. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2023.5.1.7
29. Gajović, A., Cvetković, V., Renner, R., & Cvetković, V. (2025). Advancing the Circular Economy through Construction and Demolition Waste Management for Disaster Risk-Informed Practice: Comparative Insights from Serbia and the European Union. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(2), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.2.4
30. Gavrilović, L., Milanović Pešić, A., & Urošev, M. (2012). A hydrological analysis of the greatest floods in Serbia in the 1960–2010 period. Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 7(4), 107–116.
31. Hossen, M. N., Nawaz, S., & Kabir, M. H. (2022). Flood Research in Bangladesh and Future Direction: an insight from last three decades. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 15–41. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2022.4.1.2
32. Husted, L., Opper, M. I., & Park, R. J. (2022). The impact of natural disasters on human capital (EdWorkingPaper No. 22-548). Providence, RI: Annenberg Institute at Brown University.
33. Iftikhar, A., & Iqbal, J. (2024). Changes in Lulc and Drainage Network Patterns the Cause of Urban Flooding in Karachi City. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 91–102. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2024.6.1.6
34. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Summary for policymakers. In H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, E. S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, M. Tignor, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, & A. Okem (Eds.), Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 3–33). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
35. Inusa, M., Chukwudi Nnaemeka, E., Nyomo, J. D., Osawe, I. E., Obadaki, Y. Y., Ismail, A., ... Abdullahi Bichi, A. (2025). Nature and Extent of Flood Risk Downstream of the Kubanni Dam, Kaduna State, Nigeria. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.1.1
36. Izveštaj o svrsishodnosti revizije – Prevencija poplava u Republici Srbiji [Performance audit report—Flood prevention in the Republic of Serbia]. (2019). Beograd, Serbia: Državna revizorska institucija.
37. Janković, L., Cvetković, V. M., Gačić, J., Renner, R., & Jakovljević, V. (2025). Integrating psychosocial support into emergency and disaster management and public safety: The role of the Red Cross of Serbia. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(1), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.1.8
38. Jovanović Popović, D. (2025). The Role Of Nanotechnology in Fire Protection. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(2), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.2.17
39. Kljajić, N., Popović, V., & Grujić, B. (2016). Protection against detrimental effects from waters in the Republic of Serbia. Ekonomika poljoprivrede, 63(2), 585–600.
40. Kron, W. (2005). Flood risk = hazard • values • vulnerability. Water International, 30(1), 58–68.
41. Ljuboja, B. (2013). Organizacija vlasti u lokalnoj samoupravi u Republici Srbiji [Organization of government in local self-government in the Republic of Serbia]. Beograd, Serbia: Stalna konferencija gradova i opština.
42. Mančić, T. (2025). Climate change as a security challenge, risk, and threat of the 21st century, and its consequences for critical infrastructure. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(1), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.1.14
43. Mayunga, J. S. (2007). Understanding and applying the concept of community disaster resilience: A capital-based approach. Summer Academy for Social Vulnerability and Resilience Building, 1(1), 1–16.
44. Mekgaret. (2021). Vreme i klimatske promene: Za katastrofalne poplave u Evropi najverovatnije su krivi ljudi [Weather and climate change: Humans are most likely to blame for the catastrophic floods in Europe]. BBC News.
45. Messner, F., & Meyer, V. (2006). Flood damage, vulnerability and risk perception: Challenges for flood damage research. In J. Schanze, E. Zeman, & J. Marsalek (Eds.), Flood risk management: Hazards, vulnerability and mitigation measures (pp. 149–167). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
46. Milenković, D. (2025). Theoretical, institutional and organizational aspects of the integrated disaster risk reduction system: Towards a deeper understanding of disaster resilience in Serbia. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(1), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.1.13
47. Miletic, S., & Stojanović, T. (2025). Risks and Threats to Critical Infrastructure with Reference to Trends in the Protection of Critical Infrastructure in the Republic of Serbia. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.2.15
48. Milosavljević, B. (2012). Reforma lokalne samouprave u Srbiji [Reform of local self-government in Serbia]. Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava, 12(3), 749–768.
49. Milović, N. (2018). Efekat staklene bašte [The greenhouse effect]. Klima101.
50. Nacionalna strategija zaštite i spasavanja u vanrednim situacijama [National strategy for protection and rescue in emergency situations]. (2011). Službeni glasnik RS, br. 86/2011.
51. Nacionalni program upravljanja rizikom od elementarnih nepogoda [National Programme for Disaster Risk Management]. (2014). Beograd, Serbia: Vlada Republike Srbije.
52. Nadlanu. (2014). Najveće prirodne katastrofe koje su zadesile Srbiju [The greatest natural disasters that struck Serbia]. Nadlanu.
53. Ndini, M. (2020). Opasnosti od poplava i procena rizika [Flood hazards and risk assessment]. In Upravljanje rizikom od katastrofa na Zapadnom Balkanu [Disaster risk management in the Western Balkans] (p. 53).
54. Nikolić, V., Galjak, M., & Taradi, J. (2020). Disaster risk management and community resilience. Sigurnost, 62(2), 151–160.
55. Palonka, A., & Evidente, B. (2022). Zaštita od katastrofa za celo stanovništvo: Rodno odgovoran i inkluzivan pristup smanjenju rizika od katastrofa (DRR) [Protection from disasters for the entire population: A gender-responsive and inclusive approach to disaster risk reduction (DRR)]. Belgrade, Serbia: OSCE.
56. Paudel, S., Khanal, S. N., Mathema, A. B., Maharjan, P., & Bhatta, S. (2025). Assessing Agricultural Vulnerability to Climate Change: A Study on Flood-Induced Loss and Damage in Rajapur, Bardiya, Nepal. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 265–282. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.1.15
57. Pavićević, O. (2016). Koncept otpornosti u sociologiji [The concept of resilience in sociology]. Sociologija, 58(3), 432–449.
58. Popović Mančević, M. (2025). Non-Traditional Roles of Military Actors: NATO’s Engagement in Natural Disaster Response. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.1.6
59. Rahman, M. M., Sarker, S., Biswas, A., Roy, S., & Mahmud, M. A. (2025). Exploring Flood-Induced Livelihood Vulnerabilities in Bangladesh: Insights from Teota, Manikganj and the Bangladesh Delta Plan 2100. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 333–360. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.2.18
60. Rebouh, N., Tout, F., Dinar, H., Benzid, Y., & Zouak, Z. (2024). Integrating Multi-Source Geospatial Data and AHP for Flood Susceptibility Mapping in Ain Smara, Constantine, Algeria. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 245–264. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2024.6.2.16
61. Renner, R., & Mayr-Veselinovic, C. (2025). Social License to Operate: Where Are You? The Role of Risk Communication in Raw Material Extraction. International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies, 1(1), 49–74. https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.1.5
62. Sanyal, S., & Routray, J. K. (2016). Social capital for disaster risk reduction and management: empirical evidence from the Sundarbans of India. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 19, 101–111.
63. Sekulić, G., Dimović, D., Krnajski Jović, Z. K., & Todorović, N. (2012). Procena ranjivosti na klimatske promene – Srbija [Climate vulnerability assessment – Serbia]. Beograd, Serbia: WWF and Centar za unapređenje životne sredine.
64. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. (2015). Geneva, Switzerland: UNISDR.
65. Shahriah, S., Sangma, R. V. N., Aye, S. M., Kaur, H., Puri, S., Pouy, S., ... Teo, S. P. (2025). Disaster and Dignity: Palliative Care Action Plan for Flooding in Garo Hills, Meghalaya. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 279–294. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2025.7.2.15
66. Stefanović, M., Gavrilović, Z., & Bajčetić, R. (2014). Lokalna zajednica i problematika bujičnih poplava [Local community and the issue of torrential floods]. Beograd, Serbia: OEBS, Misija u Srbiji.
67. Tiernan, A., Drennan, L., Nalau, J., Onyango, E., Morrissey, L., & Mackey, B. (2019). A review of themes in disaster resilience literature and international practice since 2012. Policy Design and Practice, 2(1), 53–74.
68. Tierney, K., & Bruneau, M. (2007). Conceptualizing and measuring resilience: A key to reducing disaster loss. TR News, 250, 14–17.
69. Tout, F. (2023). Flood policy in Algeria. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2023.5.1.3
70. Tozier de la Poterie, A., & Baudoin, M. A. (2015). From Yokohama to Sendai: Approaches to participation in international disaster risk reduction frameworks. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 6(2), 128–139.
71. Trenberth, K. E. (2005). The impact of climate change and variability on heavy precipitation, floods, and droughts. Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences, 17.
72. UNISDR. (2009). Terminology on disaster risk reduction. Geneva, Switzerland: UNISDR.
73. Vujičić, D., Maksimović, Z., & Stanimirović, B. (2020). Vodič kroz postupak primene Zakona o obnovi nakon elementarne i druge nepogode [Guide to the procedure for applying the Law on Recovery after a Natural and Other Hazard]. Beograd, Serbia: Stalna konferencija gradova i opština.
74. Zakon o smanjenju rizika od katastrofa i upravljanju vanrednim situacijama [Law on disaster risk reduction and emergency management]. (2018). Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije, br. 87/2018.
75. Zakon o vodama [Law on waters]. (2010, 2012, 2016, 2018). Službeni glasnik RS, br. 30/2010, 93/2012, 101/2016, 95/2018 i 95/2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sanja Lazić, Vladimir Cvetković, Jasmina Gačić (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting a manuscript to the Scientific and Professional Conference ‘‘Predrag Marić‘‘, Faculty of Security Studies, University of Belgrade, authors acknowledge and agree to the following copyright terms and conditions:
-
Author Rights and Ownership
- Authors retain the copyright to their submitted work. However, by submitting their manuscript, authors grant the Scientific and Professional Conference ‘‘Predrag Marić‘‘, Faculty of Security Studies, University of Belgrade a non-exclusive right to publish, distribute, and archive the work in any format (print, digital, or electronic).
- Authors are free to share, reproduce, and distribute their published work, provided proper credit is given to the original publication in this journal.
-
Licensing and Open Access Policy
- The journal publishes under the [insert applicable license, e.g., Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)], which allows others to share and adapt the work with appropriate attribution.
- Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submission complies with the journal's licensing terms and does not violate any third-party rights.
-
Originality and Permissions
- The submitted work must be original and not previously published or under consideration elsewhere.
- If the manuscript includes copyrighted materials (e.g., figures, tables, excerpts), authors must obtain the necessary permissions for reproduction and provide appropriate attribution.
-
Author Warranties
- By submitting, authors confirm that their work does not infringe on any intellectual property rights, is free from plagiarism, and adheres to ethical publishing standards.
- The journal is not responsible for any legal disputes arising from copyright infringement, misrepresentation, or unauthorized use of third-party materials.
-
Editorial and Publication Rights
- Scientific and Professional Conference ‘‘Predrag Marić‘‘, Faculty of Security Studies, University of Belgrade reserves the right to make editorial modifications to ensure clarity, consistency, and compliance with journal standards.
- If accepted, the manuscript will be published online and made publicly available according to the journal’s open-access policy.
By proceeding with submission, authors confirm that they have read and agreed to the terms outlined in this Copyright Notice.